Stephanos Bibas
Private practice · Philadelphia, Pa. · Attorney · argued OT 2010–2015
6arguments since OT 2010
2–3record (side argued for), 40%
41Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
72%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2015 | Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 47 | 46% |
| OT 2014 | Bank of America, N.A. v. Caulkett | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 40 | – |
| OT 2013 | Petrella v. Metro-goldwyn-mayer, Inc. | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 17 | 90% |
| OT 2011 | Panagis Vartelas v. Eric H. Holder, JR., Attorney General | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 36 | 82% |
| OT 2010 | Alejandra Tapia v. United States | Amicus | Attorney | – | 25 | – |
| OT 2010 | Michael D. Turner v. Rebecca L. Rogers et al. | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 63 | 70% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).