Thomas C. Goldstein

Private practice · Bethesda, Md. · Attorney · argued OT 2010–2020

23arguments since OT 2010
12–11record (side argued for), 52%
53Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
61%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
4101214161820

Arguments

TermCaseSideRoleResultRemarks facedDoubt (Jev)
OT 2020Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement SystemRespondentAttorneyLost3951%
OT 2020Google LLC v. Oracle America Inc.PetitionerAttorneyWon4869%
OT 2019Citgo Asphalt Refining Co. v. Frescati Shipping Co., Ltd.RespondentAttorneyWon2448%
OT 2018Air and Liquid Systems Corp. v. DevriesRespondentAttorneyWon5346%
OT 2017Cyan v. Beaver County Employees Retirement FundRespondentAttorneyWon8265%
OT 2016Bristol-myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Ca.RespondentAttorneyLost6861%
OT 2016Cal Public Employees' Retirement Sys. v. Anz SecuritiesPetitionerAttorneyLost4340%
OT 2015Directv, Inc. v. ImburgiaRespondentAttorneyLost2980%
OT 2015Heffernan v. City of Paterson, New JerseyRespondentAttorneyLost5885%
OT 2015Dollar General Corporation v. Mississippi Band of Choctaw IndiansPetitionerAttorneyLost51–
OT 2014Omnicare, Inc. v. Laborers Dist. Council Constr. Indus. Pension FundRespondentAttorneyLost2464%
OT 2014City of Los Angeles, California v. PatelRespondentAttorneyWon7668%
OT 2014Gelboim v. Bank of Am. Corp.PetitionerAttorneyWon6459%
OT 2014Mach Mining, LLC, v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionPetitionerAttorneyWon7869%
OT 2013Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. TroiceRespondentAttorneyWon3159%
OT 2013Walden v. FioreRespondentAttorneyLost6666%
OT 2013BG Group PLC v. Republic of ArgentinaPetitionerAttorneyWon2559%
OT 2012Already, LLC, Dba Yums v. Nike, Inc.RespondentAttorneyWon6048%
OT 2012Adrian Moncrieffe v. Eric H. Holder, JR., Attorney GeneralPetitionerAttorneyWon6455%
OT 2012City of Arlington, Texas et al. v. Federal Communications Commission et al.PetitionerAttorneyLost5977%
OT 2011Michael Shane Christopher et al. v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation Dba GlaxosmithklinePetitionerAttorneyLost3658%
OT 2011Albert W. Florence v. Board of Chosen Freeholders of the County of Burlington et al.PetitionerAttorneyLost8256%
OT 2010Sorrell, Attorney General of Vermont et al. v. Ims Health Inc. et al.RespondentAttorneyWon5658%

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).