Shay Dvoretzky

Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney, State Solicitor General · argued OT 2014–2025

22arguments since OT 2010

7–14record (side argued for), 33%

43Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)

61%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear

Arguments

Term	Case	Side	Role	Result	Remarks faced	Doubt (Jev)
OT 2025	Blanche, Acting Attorney General v. Lau	Respondent	Attorney	Lost	63	49%
OT 2025	FS Credit Opportunities Corp. et al. v. Saba Capital Master Fund, Ltd. et al.	Amicus (for petitioner)	Attorney	Won	44	60%
OT 2024	Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Zuch	Respondent	Attorney	Lost	23	46%
OT 2024	Republic of Hungary v. Simon	Respondent	Attorney	Lost	43	60%
OT 2023	Culley v. Marshall	Petitioner	State Solicitor General	Lost	76	43%
OT 2023	Pulsifer v. United States	Petitioner	Attorney	Lost	82	58%
OT 2022	Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools	Respondent	Attorney	Lost	60	65%
OT 2022	Polselli v. Internal Revenue Service	Petitioner	Attorney	Lost	14	38%
OT 2022	Arizona v. Navajo Nation	–	Attorney	–	67	38%
OT 2021	Southwest Airlines Co. v. Saxon	Petitioner	Attorney	Lost	52	75%
OT 2020	Caniglia v. Strom	Petitioner	Attorney	Won	75	56%
OT 2019	Rotkiske v. Klemm	Respondent	Attorney	Won	29	53%
OT 2019	Ge Energy Power Conversion France Sas v. Outokumpu Stainless USA LLC	Petitioner	Attorney	Won	20	64%
OT 2018	Tennessee Wine & Spirits Retailers Association v. Thomas	Petitioner	Attorney	Lost	27	72%
OT 2018	Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. Albrecht	Petitioner	Attorney	Won	16	83%
OT 2018	Air and Liquid Systems Corp. v. Devries	Petitioner	Attorney	Lost	39	88%
OT 2017	Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach, Florida	Respondent	Attorney	Lost	27	82%
OT 2017	Sveen v. Melin	Respondent	Attorney	Lost	41	55%
OT 2016	Town of Chester v. Laroe Estates	Respondent	Attorney	Lost	54	67%
OT 2016	NLRB v. SW General, Inc.	Respondent	Attorney	Won	27	71%
OT 2015	Husky International Electronics, Inc., v. Ritz	Petitioner	Attorney	Won	23	48%
OT 2014	Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.	Respondent	Attorney	Lost	55	80%

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).