Scott E. Gant
Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney · argued OT 2017–2019
2arguments since OT 2010
0–2record (side argued for), 0%
48Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
55%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2019 | Rotkiske v. Klemm | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 39 | 54% |
| OT 2017 | Patchak v. Zinke | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 57 | 57% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).