Scott A. Keller

Private practice · Washington, D.C. · State Solicitor General, Attorney · argued OT 2014–2021

12arguments since OT 2010
5–5record (side argued for), 50%
45Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
75%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
31415161718192021

Arguments

TermCaseSideRoleResultRemarks facedDoubt (Jev)
OT 2021National Federation of Independent Business v. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration–Attorney–4561%
OT 2017Abbott v. PerezPetitionerState Solicitor GeneralWon3777%
OT 2017Ayestas v. DavisRespondentState Solicitor GeneralLost4878%
OT 2017No. 141-origPetitionerState Solicitor General–14–
OT 2016Davila v. DavisRespondentState Solicitor GeneralWon5177%
OT 2016Buck v. DavisRespondentState Solicitor GeneralLost3673%
OT 2016Moore v. TexasRespondentState Solicitor GeneralLost4277%
OT 2015United States v. TexasRespondentState Solicitor GeneralWon52–
OT 2015Whole Woman's Health v. HellerstedtRespondentState Solicitor GeneralLost8385%
OT 2015Evenwel v. AbbottRespondentState Solicitor GeneralWon1767%
OT 2014Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans, Inc.PetitionerState Solicitor GeneralWon6379%
OT 2014Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc.PetitionerState Solicitor GeneralLost5681%

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).