Sarah M. Harris
Office of the Solicitor General · Washington, D.C. · Attorney, Office of the Solicitor General, Deputy Solicitor General · argued OT 2020–2026
13arguments since OT 2010
9–3record (side argued for), 75%
54Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
54%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2026 | Suncor Energy (U.S.A.) Inc. v. Commissioners of Boulder County | Amicus (for petitioner) | Deputy Solicitor General | – | 40 | – |
| OT 2025 | National Republican Senatorial Committee et al. v. Federal Election Commission et al. | Amicus (for petitioner) | Deputy Solicitor General | Won | 28 | 58% |
| OT 2025 | United States v. Hemani | Petitioner | Deputy Solicitor General | Lost | 94 | 76% |
| OT 2025 | Monsanto Company v. Durnell | Amicus (for petitioner) | Deputy Solicitor General | Won | 19 | 44% |
| OT 2025 | Wolford et al. v. Lopez, Attorney General of Hawaii | Amicus (for petitioner) | Deputy Solicitor General | Won | 52 | 69% |
| OT 2024 | Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers' Research | Petitioner | Office of the Solicitor General | Won | 102 | 45% |
| OT 2024 | Mahmoud v. Taylor | Amicus (for petitioner) | Deputy Solicitor General | Won | 51 | 42% |
| OT 2024 | CC/Devas (Mauritius) Limited v. Antrix Corp. Ltd. | Amicus (for petitioner) | Office of the Solicitor General | Won | 5 | 17% |
| OT 2022 | Financial Oversight and Management Bd for Puerto Rico v. Centro de Periodismo Investigativo | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 53 | 49% |
| OT 2022 | Bartenwerfer v. Buckley | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 44 | 64% |
| OT 2021 | Egbert v. Boule | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 34 | 69% |
| OT 2020 | Salinas v. U.S. Railroad Retirement Board | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 28 | 63% |
| OT 2020 | Carr v. Saul, Commissioner of Social Security | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 25 | 50% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).