Jonathan C. Bond
Office of the Solicitor General · Washington, D.C. · Assistant to the Solicitor General · argued OT 2017–2021
10arguments since OT 2010
6–3record (side argued for), 67%
44Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
57%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2021 | Boechler, P.C. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 58 | 60% |
| OT 2021 | Becerra v. Empire Health Foundation | Petitioner | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 36 | 78% |
| OT 2020 | Cic Services, LLC v. Internal Revenue Service | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 35 | 61% |
| OT 2020 | Pereida v. Wilkinson | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 36 | 55% |
| OT 2019 | Shular v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 46 | 72% |
| OT 2019 | Rotkiske v. Klemm | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 2 | 33% |
| OT 2018 | Fort Bend County, Texas v. Davis | Amicus | Assistant to the Solicitor General | – | 8 | 22% |
| OT 2018 | Mount Lemmon Fire District v. Guido | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 8 | 56% |
| OT 2018 | Obduskey v. Mccarthy & Holthus LLP | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 18 | 63% |
| OT 2017 | Sas Institute Inc. v. Iancu | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 51 | 73% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).