Anthony A. Yang
Office of the Solicitor General · Washington, D.C. · Assistant to the Solicitor General, State Solicitor General · argued OT 2010–2025
37arguments since OT 2010
22–13record (side argued for), 63%
56Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
60%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2025 | Ahmad Abouammo v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 120 | – |
| OT 2025 | Michael S. Bowe v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 82 | 66% |
| OT 2024 | Velazquez v. Bondi | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 118 | 61% |
| OT 2024 | Lackey v. Stinnie | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 51 | 55% |
| OT 2023 | Murray v. Ubs Securities, LLC | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 55 | 37% |
| OT 2023 | Truck Insurance Exchange v. Kaiser Gypsum Company | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 16 | 50% |
| OT 2022 | Helix Energy Solutions Group v. Hewitt | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 38 | 49% |
| OT 2022 | Perez v. Sturgis Public Schools | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 23 | 31% |
| OT 2021 | George v. Mcdonough | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 52 | 58% |
| OT 2021 | Ysleta Del Sur Pueblo v. Texas | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 48 | 36% |
| OT 2020 | Niz-chavez v. Garland, Attorney General | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 37 | 63% |
| OT 2019 | U.S. Forest Service v. Cowpasture River Preservation Association | Petitioner | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 24 | 62% |
| OT 2019 | Georgia v. Public.resource.org Inc. | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 27 | 68% |
| OT 2018 | Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media | Amicus | Assistant to the Solicitor General | – | 34 | 51% |
| OT 2018 | Culbertson v. Berryhill | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 22 | 56% |
| OT 2018 | Biestek v. Berryhill | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 67 | 68% |
| OT 2016 | Dean v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 49 | 70% |
| OT 2016 | Shaw v. United States | – | Assistant to the Solicitor General | – | 61 | – |
| OT 2016 | Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc. | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 27 | – |
| OT 2015 | Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 9 | 80% |
| OT 2015 | Campbell-ewald Co. v. Gomez | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 20 | 67% |
| OT 2015 | Taylor v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 59 | – |
| OT 2014 | Mata v. Lynch | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 12 | 46% |
| OT 2014 | Holt v. Hobbs | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 24 | 64% |
| OT 2014 | Oneok, Inc., v. Learjet, Inc. | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 13 | 57% |
| OT 2013 | Loughrin v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 61 | 68% |
| OT 2013 | Sandifer v. United States Steel Corp. | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 15 | 56% |
| OT 2013 | Brandt Trust v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 58 | 54% |
| OT 2012 | Mutual Pharmaceutical Company, Inc. v. Karen L. Bartlett | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 12 | 62% |
| OT 2012 | Genesis Healthcare Corporation et al. v. Laura Symczyk | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 17 | 67% |
| OT 2012 | Kim Millbrook v. United States | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 16 | 71% |
| OT 2011 | Alexander Vasquez v. United States. | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 50 | 63% |
| OT 2011 | First American Financial Corporation, Successor in Interest to the First American Corporation et al. v. Denise P. Edwards | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 25 | 62% |
| OT 2011 | Missouri v. Galin E. Frye | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 19 | 75% |
| OT 2010 | United States v. Tohono O'odham Nation | Petitioner | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 39 | 76% |
| OT 2010 | Federal Communications Commission et al. v. AT&T Inc. et al. | Petitioner | State Solicitor General | Won | 33 | 57% |
| OT 2010 | Glen Scott Milner v. Department of the Navy | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 69 | 71% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).