Adam G. Unikowsky

Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney, State Solicitor General · argued OT 2015–2025

15arguments since OT 2010
12–3record (side argued for), 80%
55Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
60%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
3151719212325

Arguments

TermCaseSideRoleResultRemarks facedDoubt (Jev)
OT 2025Jules v. Andre Balazs Properties et al.PetitionerAttorneyLost7161%
OT 2025Chatrie v. United StatesPetitionerAttorneyWon12357%
OT 2025Isabel Rico v. United StatesPetitionerAttorneyWon1833%
OT 2024Williams v. ReedPetitionerState Solicitor GeneralWon8150%
OT 2023Becerra v. San Carlos Apache TribeRespondentAttorneyWon7047%
OT 2023Acheson Hotels, LLC v. LauferPetitionerAttorneyWon7167%
OT 2019Barton v. BarrPetitionerAttorneyLost4971%
OT 2019Espinoza v. Montana Department of RevenueRespondentAttorneyLost6771%
OT 2018Washington State Department of Licensing v. Cougar Den Inc.RespondentAttorneyWon6471%
OT 2017Artis v. District of ColumbiaPetitionerAttorneyWon2867%
OT 2017Sveen v. MelinPetitionerAttorneyWon6267%
OT 2016Kokesh v. SECPetitionerAttorneyWon3456%
OT 2016Honeycutt v. United StatesPetitionerAttorneyWon2755%
OT 2016Howell v. HowellPetitionerAttorneyWon3063%
OT 2015Puerto Rico v. Sanchez ValleRespondentAttorneyWon3763%

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).