Kennedy v. Braidwood Management

U.S. Supreme Court · decided June 27, 2025 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)

Decided
June 27, 2025
Docket
No. 24-316
Argued
April 21, 2025
Term
October Term 2024
Vote
6–3
Majority author
Justice Kavanaugh
Issue area
Economic Activity
Disposition
Reversed and remanded
Outcome
Petitioning party won
Ideological direction
Liberal

How the Justices voted

Majority
Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Sotomayor, Justice Kagan, Justice Kavanaugh (wrote), Justice Barrett, Justice K. B. Jackson
Dissenting
Justice Thomas (wrote), Justice Alito, Justice Gorsuch

Oral argument transcript and advocates

Opinion excerpt

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 606 U. S. Part 2 Pages 748–830 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 27, 2025 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. C. 20543, pio@supremecourt.gov, of any typographical or other formal errors. Syllabus KENNEDY, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al. v. BRAIDWOOD MANAGEMENT, INC., et al. certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the fth circuit No. 24–316. Argued April 21, 2025—Decided June 27, 2025 In 1984, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) created the U. S. Preventive Services Task Force, a body that formulates evidence-based recommendations regarding preventive healthcare serv- ices. Congress codifed the Task Force's role in 1999, establishing it as an entity within the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) in HHS's Public Health Service. The Task Force currently consists of 16 volunteer members appointed by the Secretary of HHS to staggered 4-year terms. Before 2010, Task Force recommendations were purely advisory. The Affordable Care Act of 2010 changed this by requiring most health insurers and group health plans to cover with- Poaut gcoset s haPrinrg…

Excerpt of a 179,559-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.

← Back to the decisions database