Genovevo Salinas, Petitioner v. Texas (570 U.S. 178)

U.S. Supreme Court · decided June 17, 2013 · Supreme Court Database (Spaeth)

Citation
570 U.S. 178 · 133 S. Ct. 2174
Docket
No. 12-246
Argued
April 17, 2013
Decided
June 17, 2013
Term
October Term 2012
Vote
5–4
Majority author
Justice Alito
Issue area
Criminal Procedure
Disposition
Affirmed
Outcome
Petitioning party lost
Ideological direction
Conservative

How the Justices voted

Majority
Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Kennedy, Justice Alito (wrote)
Concurring in the judgment
Justice Scalia, Justice Thomas (wrote)
Dissenting
Justice Ginsburg, Justice Breyer (wrote), Justice Sotomayor, Justice Kagan

Oral argument transcript and advocates · Opinion on Justia

Opinion excerpt

Petitioner's interview with the police lasted approximately one hour. All agree that the interview was noncustodial, and the parties litigated this case on the assumption that he was not read Miranda warnings. See Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966). For most of the interview, petitioner answered the officer's questions. But when asked whether his shotgun "would match the shells recovered at the scene of the murder," App. 17, petitioner declined to answer. Instead, petitioner "[l]ooked down at the floor, shuffled his feet, bit his bottom lip, cl[e]nched his hands in his lap, [and] began to tighten up." Id ., at 18. After a few moments of silence, the officer asked additional questions, which petitioner answered. Ibid. Following the interview, police arrested petitioner on outstanding traffic warrants. Prosecutors soon concluded that there was insufficient evidence to charge him with the murders, and he was released. A few days later, police obtained a statement from a man who said he had heard petitioner confess to the killings. On the strength of that additional evidence, prosecutors decided to charge petitioner, but by this time he had absconded. In 2007, police discovered petitioner living in the Houston area under an assumed name. Petitioner did not testify at trial. Over his objection, prosecutors used his reaction to the officer's…

Excerpt of a 46,720-character opinion. The full text and citation network load in the interactive viewer above.

← Back to the decisions database