Yaira Dubin
Office of the Solicitor General · Washington, D.C. · Assistant to the Solicitor General · argued OT 2022–2024
6arguments since OT 2010
5–1record (side argued for), 83%
39Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
53%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2024 | United States v. Miller | Petitioner | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 36 | 51% |
| OT 2024 | Cunningham v. Cornell University | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 42 | 48% |
| OT 2023 | Connelly v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 31 | 63% |
| OT 2023 | Warner Chappell Music v. Neal | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 8 | 44% |
| OT 2022 | Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts v. Goldsmith | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 43 | 47% |
| OT 2022 | Santos-zacaria v. Garland | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 51 | 67% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).