Xiao Wang
Private practice · Charlottesville, Virginia · Attorney · argued OT 2024
2arguments since OT 2010
2–0record (side argued for), 100%
43Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
31%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2024 | Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 33 | 15% |
| OT 2024 | Cunningham v. Cornell University | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 52 | 47% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).