Vivek Suri
Office of the Solicitor General · Washington, D.C. · Assistant to the Solicitor General · argued OT 2019–2025
14arguments since OT 2010
7–5record (side argued for), 58%
56Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
56%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2025 | Noem, Secretary of Homeland Security et al. v. Al Otro Lado et al. | Petitioner | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 64 | 69% |
| OT 2025 | Federal Communications Commission et al. v. AT&T Inc. et al. | – | Assistant to the Solicitor General | – | 51 | 67% |
| OT 2025 | First Choice Women's Resource Centers, Inc. v. Davenport, Attorney General of New Jersey | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 31 | 41% |
| OT 2024 | Food and Drug Administration v. R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. | Petitioner | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 69 | 61% |
| OT 2024 | Wisconsin Bell v. U.S., ex rel. Todd Heath | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 30 | 42% |
| OT 2023 | Chiaverini v. City of Napoleon, Ohio | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 12 | 23% |
| OT 2023 | Rudisill v. Mcdonough | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 67 | 71% |
| OT 2022 | Dubin v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 73 | 76% |
| OT 2022 | Glacier Northwest v. Int'l Brotherhood of Teamsters | Amicus | Assistant to the Solicitor General | – | 29 | 26% |
| OT 2021 | Vega v. Tekoh | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 13 | 50% |
| OT 2021 | Gallardo v. Marstiller | Amicus (for petitioner) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 21 | 59% |
| OT 2020 | Guam v. United States | Respondent | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Lost | 28 | 58% |
| OT 2020 | Johnson v. Guzman Chavez | Petitioner | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 39 | 58% |
| OT 2019 | Ritzen Group Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLC | Amicus (for respondent) | Assistant to the Solicitor General | Won | 12 | 77% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).