Timothy S. Bishop

Private practice · Chicago, Illinois · Attorney · argued OT 2012–2022

4arguments since OT 2010
3–1record (side argued for), 75%
50Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
62%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
1121416182022

Arguments

TermCaseSideRoleResultRemarks facedDoubt (Jev)
OT 2022National Pork Producers Council v. RossPetitionerAttorneyLost10567%
OT 2018Weyerhaeuser Company v. U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServicePetitionerAttorneyWon4373%
OT 2017National Association of Manufacturers v. Department of DefensePetitionerAttorneyWon2356%
OT 2012Doug Decker, in His Official Capacity As Oregon State Forester et al. v. Northwest Environmental Defense Center;PetitionerAttorneyWon3050%

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).