Thomas M. Fisher

State government · Indianapolis, Indiana · State Solicitor General · argued OT 2018–2022

2arguments since OT 2010
0–2record (side argued for), 0%
45Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
85%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
11819202122

Arguments

TermCaseSideRoleResultRemarks facedDoubt (Jev)
OT 2022Health and Hospital Corporation of Marion County, Indiana v. TalevskiAmicus (for petitioner)State Solicitor GeneralLost1488%
OT 2018Timbs v. IndianaRespondentState Solicitor GeneralLost4583%

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).