Thomas G. Hungar
Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney · argued OT 2010–2024
4arguments since OT 2010
3–1record (side argued for), 75%
42Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
59%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2024 | Dewberry Group v. Dewberry Engineers | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 34 | 51% |
| OT 2022 | Slack Technologies v. Pirani | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 67 | 51% |
| OT 2013 | Town of Greece v. Galloway | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 42 | 58% |
| OT 2010 | Microsoft Corporation v. I4I Limited Partnership et al. | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 24 | 76% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).