Theodore J. Boutrous Jr.
Private practice · Los Angeles, California · Attorney · argued OT 2010–2025
5arguments since OT 2010
2–3record (side argued for), 40%
38Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
77%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2025 | Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC et al. | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 46 | 67% |
| OT 2018 | Cochise Consultancy Inc. v. U.S., ex rel. Hunt | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 39 | 85% |
| OT 2018 | New Prime Inc. v. Oliveira | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 33 | 80% |
| OT 2012 | The Standard Fire Insurance Company v. Greg Knowles | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 39 | 81% |
| OT 2010 | Wal-mart Stores, Inc. v. Betty Dukes et al. | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 34 | 72% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).