Tejinder Singh
Private practice · Bethesda, Md. · Attorney · argued OT 2013–2024
4arguments since OT 2010
3–1record (side argued for), 75%
41Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
44%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2024 | Wisconsin Bell v. U.S., ex rel. Todd Heath | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 70 | 44% |
| OT 2022 | United States ex rel. Schutte v. Supervalu Inc. | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 60 | 37% |
| OT 2016 | State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. United States, Ex Rel Rigsby | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 10 | 46% |
| OT 2013 | Lane v. Franks | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 24 | 50% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).