Sri Srinivasan

Office of the Solicitor General · Washington, D.C. · Deputy Solicitor General · argued OT 2011–2012

8arguments since OT 2010
4–2record (side argued for), 67%
43Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
67%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
51112

Arguments

TermCaseSideRoleResultRemarks facedDoubt (Jev)
OT 2012Arizona et al. v. the Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. et al.Amicus (for respondent)Deputy Solicitor GeneralWon1682%
OT 2012United States v. WindsorAmicus (for respondent)Deputy Solicitor GeneralWon3867%
OT 2012Agency for International Development et al. v. Alliance for Open Society International, Inc. et al.PetitionerDeputy Solicitor GeneralLost3787%
OT 2012Maetta Vance v. Ball State UniversityAmicusDeputy Solicitor General–2460%
OT 2012United States v. James X. BormesPetitionerDeputy Solicitor GeneralWon4963%
OT 2011Rick Perry, Governor of Texas et al., Appellants v. Shannon Perez et al.Amicus (for respondent)Deputy Solicitor GeneralLost2967%
OT 2011Virgil D. 'Gus' Reichle, JR. et al. v. Steven HowardsAmicus (for petitioner)Deputy Solicitor GeneralWon2659%
OT 2011Curt Messerschmidt et al. v. Brenda Millender, As Executor of the Estate of Augusta Millender, Deceased et al.AmicusDeputy Solicitor General–2052%

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).