Sopan Joshi

Office of the Solicitor General · Washington, D.C. · Assistant to the Solicitor General · argued OT 2019–2026

16arguments since OT 2010
9–3record (side argued for), 75%
73Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
58%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
31920212223242526

Arguments

TermCaseSideRoleResultRemarks facedDoubt (Jev)
OT 2026Department of the Air Force v. Prutehi GuahanPetitionerAssistant to the Solicitor General–100–
OT 2025Blanche, Acting Attorney General v. LauPetitionerAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon9651%
OT 2025Geo Group, Inc. v. Menocal et al.Amicus (for respondent)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon910%
OT 2025Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC et al.Amicus (for respondent)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralLost5961%
OT 2024Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings v. DavisAmicusAssistant to the Solicitor General–4965%
OT 2024Republic of Hungary v. SimonAmicus (for petitioner)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon4255%
OT 2024Bufkin v. CollinsRespondentAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon7668%
OT 2023O'connor-ratcliff v. GarnierAmicus (for petitioner)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon2868%
OT 2023Federal Bureau of Investigation v. FikrePetitionerAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralLost7973%
OT 2022Arellano v. McdonoughRespondentAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon2569%
OT 2022Smith v. United StatesRespondentAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon62–
OT 2021Houston Community College System v. WilsonAmicus (for petitioner)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon1663%
OT 2021Shurtleff v. City of BostonAmicus (for petitioner)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon89–
OT 2020Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v. Arkansas Teacher Retirement SystemAmicusAssistant to the Solicitor General–2639%
OT 2019Monasky v. TaglieriAmicusAssistant to the Solicitor General–1453%
OT 2019Thole v. U.S. Bank, N.A.Amicus (for petitioner)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralLost1772%

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).