Scott L. Nelson
Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney · argued OT 2011–2021
3arguments since OT 2010
1–2record (side argued for), 33%
36Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
59%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2021 | Viking River Cruises v. Moriana | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 29 | 39% |
| OT 2011 | Compucredit Corporation et al. v. Wanda Greenwood et al. | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 26 | 78% |
| OT 2011 | Marcus D. Mims v. Arrow Financial Services, LLC | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 52 | 59% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).