Ronald Eisenberg
Private practice · Philadelphia, Pa. · Attorney · argued OT 2011–2015
2arguments since OT 2010
1–1record (side argued for), 50%
43Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
64%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2015 | Williams v. Pennsylvania | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 59 | 72% |
| OT 2011 | Eric Greene, Aka Jarmaine Q. Trice v. Jon Fisher, Superintendent, State Correctional Institution at Smithfield et al. | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 26 | 56% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).