Roman Martinez

Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Assistant to the Solicitor General, Office of the Solicitor General, Attorney · argued OT 2013–2025

16arguments since OT 2010
10–5record (side argued for), 67%
52Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
61%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
313151719212325

Arguments

TermCaseSideRoleResultRemarks facedDoubt (Jev)
OT 2025National Republican Senatorial Committee et al. v. Federal Election Commission et al.Amicus (for respondent)AttorneyLost3863%
OT 2024A.J.T. v. Osseo Area Schools, Independent School District No. 279PetitionerAttorneyWon3732%
OT 2023No. 22-1219PetitionerAttorney–111–
OT 2022Perez v. Sturgis Public SchoolsPetitionerAttorneyWon3753%
OT 2022Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts v. GoldsmithPetitionerAttorneyLost8168%
OT 2021Vega v. TekohPetitionerAttorneyWon4072%
OT 2021ZF Automotive Us v. Luxshare, Ltd.PetitionerAttorneyWon2461%
OT 2019Barr v. American Association of Political Consultants Inc.RespondentAttorneyWon3451%
OT 2019Babb v. WilkiePetitionerOffice of the Solicitor GeneralWon6167%
OT 2016Fry v. Napoleon Community SchoolsAmicus (for petitioner)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon2963%
OT 2015Simmons v. HimmelreichPetitionerAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralLost4867%
OT 2015Halo Electronics v. Pulse ElectronicsAmicus (for petitioner)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon1154%
OT 2015Musacchio v. United StatesRespondentAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon4867%
OT 2014Yates v. United StatesRespondentAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralLost6466%
OT 2014United States v. Kwai Fun WongPetitionerAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralLost4067%
OT 2013Octane Fitness, LLC v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc.Amicus (for petitioner)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon2261%

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).