Robert M. Loeb
Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney · argued OT 2017–2023
4arguments since OT 2010
1–3record (side argued for), 25%
46Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
69%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2023 | Muldrow v. City of St. Louis, Missouri | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 60 | 69% |
| OT 2021 | Shinn v. Ramirez | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 23 | 63% |
| OT 2018 | Food Marketing Institute v. Argus Leader Media | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 42 | 74% |
| OT 2017 | Byrd v. United States | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 58 | 68% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).