Peter K. Stris
Private practice · Los Angeles, California · Attorney · argued OT 2015–2021
6arguments since OT 2010
3–3record (side argued for), 50%
34Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
59%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2021 | Unicolors, Inc v. H&M Hennes & Mauritz, LP | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 55 | 46% |
| OT 2019 | Thole v. U.S. Bank, N.A. | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 28 | 77% |
| OT 2018 | Fourth Estate Public Benefit Corp. v. Wall-street.com | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 17 | 72% |
| OT 2016 | Microsoft Corp. v. Baker | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 38 | 74% |
| OT 2015 | Montanile v. Bd. of National Elevator Industry Health Benefit Plan | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 29 | 39% |
| OT 2015 | Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Manning | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 38 | 49% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).