Peter D. Keisler
Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney · argued OT 2010–2020
5arguments since OT 2010
3–2record (side argued for), 60%
32Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
58%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2020 | Hollyfrontier Cheyenne Refining, LLC v. Renewable Fuels Association | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 42 | 52% |
| OT 2013 | EPA v. Eme Homer City Generation | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 26 | 56% |
| OT 2013 | Util. Air Regulatory Group v. EPA | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 49 | 60% |
| OT 2011 | Dana Roberts v. Sea-land Services, Inc. et al. | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 19 | 65% |
| OT 2010 | American Electric Power Company, Inc. et al. v. Connecticut et al. | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 23 | 60% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).