Paul W. Hughes
Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney · argued OT 2014–2022
10arguments since OT 2010
5–5record (side argued for), 50%
39Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
59%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2022 | Santos-zacaria v. Garland | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 37 | 46% |
| OT 2020 | Johnson v. Guzman Chavez | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 36 | 46% |
| OT 2019 | Guerrero-lasprilla v. Barr | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 23 | 60% |
| OT 2019 | Nasrallah v. Barr | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 35 | 51% |
| OT 2019 | Kansas v. Garcia | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 69 | 53% |
| OT 2018 | Kisor v. Wilkie | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 44 | 85% |
| OT 2018 | Manhattan Community Access Corp. v. Halleck | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 67 | 57% |
| OT 2017 | Lamar, Archer & Cofrin v. Appling | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 18 | 68% |
| OT 2015 | Ross v. Blake | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 25 | 54% |
| OT 2014 | Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana Bank | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 38 | 65% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).