Paul R.Q. Wolfson

Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney · argued OT 2011–2012

2arguments since OT 2010
0–2record (side argued for), 0%
52Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
67%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
11112

Arguments

TermCaseSideRoleResultRemarks facedDoubt (Jev)
OT 2012Koontz v. St. Johns River Water Mgmt. Dist.RespondentAttorneyLost40–
OT 2011Curt Messerschmidt et al. v. Brenda Millender, As Executor of the Estate of Augusta Millender, Deceased et al.RespondentAttorneyLost6367%

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).