Paul L. Hoffman
Private practice · Hermosa Beach, California · Attorney · argued OT 2011–2025
5arguments since OT 2010
0–4record (side argued for), 0%
42Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
68%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2025 | Cisco Systems, Inc. et al. v. Doe I et al. | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 51 | 67% |
| OT 2021 | Vega v. Tekoh | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 32 | 76% |
| OT 2020 | Nestle USA v. Doe I | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 37 | 70% |
| OT 2012 | Esther Kiobel, Individually and on Behalf of Her Late Husband, Dr. Barinem Kiobel et al. v. Royal Dutch Petroleum Co. et al. | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 61 | 60% |
| OT 2011 | No. 10-1491 | Petitioner | Attorney | – | 27 | – |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).