Paul D. Clement

Private practice · Alexandria, Virginia · Attorney · argued OT 2010–2026

76arguments since OT 2010
45–24record (side argued for), 65%
39Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
66%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
9101214161820222426

Arguments

TermCaseSideRoleResultRemarks facedDoubt (Jev)
OT 2026Salazar v. Paramount GlobalRespondentAttorney–57–
OT 2025Trump, President of the United States v. CookRespondentAttorneyWon7652%
OT 2025Havana Docks Corporation v. Royal Caribbean Cruises, Ltd. et al.RespondentAttorneyLost4558%
OT 2025Chevron U.S.A. Inc. et al. v. Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana et al.PetitionerAttorneyWon2757%
OT 2025Bost et al. v. Illinois State Board of Elections et al.PetitionerAttorneyWon6061%
OT 2025FS Credit Opportunities Corp. et al. v. Saba Capital Master Fund, Ltd. et al.RespondentAttorneyLost4349%
OT 2025Cox Communications, Inc. v. Sony Music Entertainment et al.RespondentAttorneyLost4866%
OT 2025Watson, Secretary of State of Mississippi v. Republican National Committee et al.RespondentAttorneyLost6278%
OT 2025Montgomery v. Caribe Transport II, LLC et al.PetitionerAttorneyWon5541%
OT 2025Monsanto Company v. DurnellPetitionerAttorneyWon3462%
OT 2024Federal Communications Commission v. Consumers' ResearchPetitionerAttorneyWon4635%
OT 2024Seven County Infastructure Coalition v. Eagle County, ColoradoPetitionerAttorneyWon3950%
OT 2024Glossip v. OklahomaRespondentAttorneyLost5539%
OT 2023No. 22-555PetitionerAttorney–35–
OT 2023Loper Bright Enterprises v. RaimondoPetitionerAttorneyWon3763%
OT 2023Moody v. Netchoice, LLCRespondentAttorneyLost8157%
OT 2022Helix Energy Solutions Group v. HewittPetitionerAttorneyLost7364%
OT 2022Axon Enterprise v. Federal Trade CommissionPetitionerAttorneyWon3950%
OT 2022Amgen Inc. v. SanofiRespondentAttorneyWon3124%
OT 2021Kennedy v. Bremerton School DistrictPetitionerAttorneyWon6360%
OT 2021Morgan v. Sundance, Inc.RespondentAttorneyLost4172%
OT 2021New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. BruenPetitionerAttorneyWon5852%
OT 2021Viking River Cruises v. MorianaPetitionerAttorneyWon4171%
OT 2020Yellen v. Confederated Tribes of the Chehalis ReservationPetitionerAttorneyWon2661%
OT 2020Transunion LLC v. RamirezPetitionerAttorneyWon4243%
OT 2020Facebook Inc. v. DuguidPetitionerAttorneyWon2248%
OT 2020Penneast Pipeline Co. v. New JerseyPetitionerAttorneyWon2666%
OT 2019Seila Law LLC v. Consumer Financial Protection BureauAmicus (for respondent)AttorneyLost3678%
OT 2019Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v. PennsylvaniaPetitionerAttorneyWon1733%
OT 2019No. 18-280PetitionerAttorney–29–
OT 2019U.S. Forest Service v. Cowpasture River Preservation AssociationPetitionerAttorneyWon2354%
OT 2019No. 18-1165PetitionerAttorney–24–
OT 2019Maine Community Health Options v. United StatesPetitionerAttorneyWon2376%
OT 2018Rucho v. Common CausePetitionerAttorneyWon4679%
OT 2018Parker Drilling Management Services, Ltd. v. NewtonPetitionerAttorneyWon2968%
OT 2018Virginia House of Delegates v. Bethune-hillPetitionerAttorneyLost2567%
OT 2018Rimini Street Inc. v. Oracle USA Inc.RespondentAttorneyLost2472%
OT 2017Merit Management Group, LP v. Fti Consulting, IncRespondentAttorneyWon2448%
OT 2017Jesner v. Arab Bank, PLCRespondentAttorneyWon3774%
OT 2017Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic AssociationRespondentAttorneyLost3291%
OT 2017Epic Systems Corp. v. LewisPetitionerAttorneyWon2882%
OT 2017Encino Motorcars, LLC v. NavarroPetitionerAttorneyWon2971%
OT 2017Westerngeco LLC v. Ion Geophysical Corp.PetitionerAttorneyWon1779%
OT 2016Cal Public Employees' Retirement Sys. v. Anz SecuritiesRespondentAttorneyWon3477%
OT 2016Bethune-hill v. Va Bd. of ElectionsRespondentAttorneyLost1569%
OT 2016Cooper v. HarrisPetitionerAttorneyLost2477%
OT 2015Encino Motorcars, LLC v. NavarroPetitionerAttorneyWon2776%
OT 2015Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Electric Power Supply AssociationRespondentAttorneyLost3761%
OT 2015Hughes v. PPL EnergyplusRespondentAttorneyWon24–
OT 2015Zubik v. BurwellPetitionerAttorneyWon3078%
OT 2015Nebraska v. ParkerRespondentAttorneyWon33–
OT 2015California Franchise Tax Board v. HyattPetitionerAttorneyWon4179%
OT 2014Kingsley v. HendricksonRespondentAttorneyLost2287%
OT 2014Integrity Staffing Solutions, Inc. v. BuskPetitionerAttorneyWon2779%
OT 2014Arizona State Legislature v. Arizona Independent Redistricting CommissionPetitionerAttorneyLost4681%
OT 2013American Broadcasting Cos. v. Aereo, Inc.PetitionerAttorneyWon3167%
OT 2013Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores–Attorney–5989%
OT 2013Chadbourne & Parke LLP v. TroicePetitionerAttorneyLost2965%
OT 2013Northwest, Inc. v. GinsbergPetitionerAttorneyWon2481%
OT 2013Bond v. United StatesPetitionerAttorneyWon3472%
OT 2012PPL Corporation and Subsidiaries v. Commissioner of Internal RevenuePetitionerAttorneyWon4774%
OT 2012Adoptive Couple v. Baby GirlRespondentAttorneyLost1262%
OT 2012Sekhar v. United StatesPetitionerAttorneyWon4071%
OT 2012United States v. WindsorRespondentAttorneyWon5884%
OT 2012Edward F. Maracich et al. v. Michael Eugene Spears et al.RespondentAttorneyLost6361%
OT 2012American Express Company et al. v. Italian Colors Restaurant et al.RespondentAttorneyLost3282%
OT 2011Rick Perry, Governor of Texas et al., Appellants v. Shannon Perez et al.PetitionerAttorneyWon3763%
OT 2011No. 11-400PetitionerAttorney–81–
OT 2011No. 11-398RespondentAttorney–35–
OT 2011National Federation of Independent Business et al. v. Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services et al.PetitionerAttorneyLost3681%
OT 2011Michael Shane Christopher et al. v. Smithkline Beecham Corporation Dba GlaxosmithklineRespondentAttorneyWon5663%
OT 2011Arizona et al. v. United StatesPetitionerAttorneyLost5267%
OT 2011Christine Armour et al. v. City of Indianapolis, Indiana et al.RespondentAttorneyWon6179%
OT 2011Pacific Operators Offshore, LLP et al. v. Luisa L. Valladolid et al.PetitionerAttorneyLost4181%
OT 2011PPL Montana, LLC v. MontanaPetitionerAttorneyWon2657%
OT 2010Carol Anne Bond v. United StatesPetitionerAttorneyWon20–

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).