Patricia A. Millett
Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney · argued OT 2011–2012
4arguments since OT 2010
2–2record (side argued for), 50%
33Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
79%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2012 | Arizona et al. v. the Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. et al. | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 38 | 82% |
| OT 2011 | Match-e-be-nash-she-wish Band of Pottawatomi Indians v. Patchak | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 22 | 91% |
| OT 2011 | Rafael Arriaza Gonzales v. Rick Thaler, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 50 | 64% |
| OT 2011 | Steve A. Filarsky v. Nicholas B. Delia. | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 21 | 77% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).