Pamela S. Karlan
Private practice · Stanford, California · Attorney · argued OT 2017–2023
3arguments since OT 2010
2–1record (side argued for), 67%
57Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
48%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2023 | O'connor-ratcliff v. Garnier | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 81 | 39% |
| OT 2019 | Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 55 | 52% |
| OT 2017 | Lozman v. City of Riviera Beach, Florida | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 36 | 53% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).