Nicole F. Reaves

Office of the Solicitor General · Washington, D.C. · Assistant to the Solicitor General · argued OT 2020–2024

9arguments since OT 2010
4–2record (side argued for), 67%
50Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
52%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
22021222324

Arguments

TermCaseSideRoleResultRemarks facedDoubt (Jev)
OT 2024A.J.T. v. Osseo Area Schools, Independent School District No. 279Amicus (for petitioner)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon2731%
OT 2024Feliciano v. Department of TransportationRespondentAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralLost5756%
OT 2023Culley v. MarshallAmicus (for respondent)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon2148%
OT 2023Gonzalez v. TrevinoAmicusAssistant to the Solicitor General–4045%
OT 2022Ohio Adjutant General’S Department v. Federal Labor Relations AuthorityRespondentAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon5551%
OT 2022Percoco v. United StatesRespondentAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralLost7268%
OT 2021Shoop v. TwyfordAmicusAssistant to the Solicitor General–2762%
OT 2021Babcock v. KijakaziRespondentAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon1753%
OT 2020Transunion LLC v. RamirezAmicusAssistant to the Solicitor General–2858%

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).