Neal K. Katyal

Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Office of the Solicitor General, Attorney · argued OT 2010–2025

45arguments since OT 2010
17–25record (side argued for), 40%
47Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
69%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
6101214161820222425

Arguments

TermCaseSideRoleResultRemarks facedDoubt (Jev)
OT 2025Learning Resources, Inc. et al. v. Trump, President of the United States et al.–Attorney–9562%
OT 2025Wolford et al. v. Lopez, Attorney General of HawaiiRespondentAttorneyLost6671%
OT 2024Nvidia Corp. v. E. Ohman J:Or Fonder AbPetitionerAttorneyLost9659%
OT 2023National Rifle Association of America v. VulloRespondentAttorneyLost2659%
OT 2022Tyler v. Hennepin County, MinnesotaRespondentAttorneyLost8879%
OT 2022Coinbase, Inc. v. BielskiPetitionerAttorneyWon5680%
OT 2022Cruz v. ArizonaPetitionerAttorneyWon3462%
OT 2022Moore v. HarperRespondentAttorneyWon10853%
OT 2022Delaware v. Pennsylvania and Wisconsin–Attorney–3166%
OT 2021Babcock v. KijakaziPetitionerAttorneyLost7042%
OT 2020Nestle USA v. Doe IPetitionerAttorneyWon3560%
OT 2020Fulton v. City of Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaRespondentAttorneyLost2267%
OT 2020Garland v. Ming DaiRespondentAttorneyLost2737%
OT 2019Romag Fasteners Inc. v. Fossil Inc.RespondentAttorneyLost3965%
OT 2019Mckinney v. ArizonaPetitionerAttorneyLost5369%
OT 2018Mcdonough v. SmithPetitionerAttorneyWon3976%
OT 2018American Legion v. American Humanist AssociationPetitionerAttorneyWon3472%
OT 2017Trump, President of U.S. v. HawaiiRespondentAttorneyLost6571%
OT 2017Hall v. HallRespondentAttorneyLost5781%
OT 2017Cyan v. Beaver County Employees Retirement FundPetitionerAttorneyLost5563%
OT 2016Town of Chester v. Laroe EstatesPetitionerAttorneyWon2384%
OT 2016Bristol-myers Squibb Co. v. Superior Court of Ca.PetitionerAttorneyWon3576%
OT 2016Endrew F. v. Douglas Cnty. Sch. Dist. Re-1RespondentAttorneyLost6976%
OT 2016Fry v. Napoleon Community SchoolsRespondentAttorneyLost4480%
OT 2016Lewis v. ClarkeRespondentAttorneyLost3687%
OT 2016Bank of America Corp. v. City of Miami, FloridaPetitionerAttorneyWon3560%
OT 2015Dietz v. BouldinRespondentAttorneyWon2585%
OT 2015Montanile v. Bd. of National Elevator Industry Health Benefit PlanRespondentAttorneyLost3264%
OT 2015No. 14-452RespondentAttorney–13–
OT 2015Dollar General Corporation v. Mississippi Band of Choctaw IndiansRespondentAttorneyWon39–
OT 2014Dep't of Homeland SEC. v. MacleanRespondentAttorneyWon4974%
OT 2014B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Indus., Inc.RespondentAttorneyLost5762%
OT 2014Oneok, Inc., v. Learjet, Inc.PetitionerAttorneyLost3567%
OT 2013Kansas v. CheeverRespondentAttorneyLost5977%
OT 2013Law v. SiegelRespondentAttorneyLost2278%
OT 2013Michigan v. Bay Mills Indian CommunityRespondentAttorneyWon5179%
OT 2013Highmark Inc. v. Allcare Health Mgmt. Sys.PetitionerAttorneyWon1067%
OT 2012Us Airways, Inc., in Its Capacity As Fiduciary and Plan Administrator of the Us Airways, Inc. Employee Benefits Plan v. James E. Mccutchen et al.PetitionerAttorneyLost5269%
OT 2012Genesis Healthcare Corporation et al. v. Laura SymczykRespondentAttorneyLost3163%
OT 2010John D. Ashcroft v. Abdullah Al-kiddPetitionerOffice of the Solicitor GeneralWon3256%
OT 2010American Electric Power Company, Inc. et al. v. Connecticut et al.RespondentOffice of the Solicitor GeneralLost3471%
OT 2010Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v. Kathleen M. Winn et al.Amicus (for petitioner)Office of the Solicitor GeneralWon2178%
OT 2010National Aeronautics and Space Administration et al. v. Robert M. Nelson et al.PetitionerOffice of the Solicitor GeneralWon6870%
OT 2010General Dynamics Corporation, v. United StatesRespondentOffice of the Solicitor GeneralLost6165%
OT 2010Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America et al. v. Michael B. Whiting et al.Amicus (for petitioner)Office of the Solicitor GeneralLost2685%

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).