Morgan L. Ratner

Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Assistant to the Solicitor General, Attorney · argued OT 2018–2025

9arguments since OT 2010
4–2record (side argued for), 67%
27Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
63%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
31819202122232425

Arguments

TermCaseSideRoleResultRemarks facedDoubt (Jev)
OT 2025Exxon Mobil Corporation v. Corporacion Cimex, S.A. (Cuba) et al.PetitionerAttorneyWon4580%
OT 2022Jones v. HendrixAmicus (for respondent)AttorneyWon2575%
OT 2020Minerva Surgical Inc. v. Hologic Inc.AmicusAssistant to the Solicitor General–2650%
OT 2020Caniglia v. StromAmicus (for respondent)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralLost3857%
OT 2019Our Lady of Guadalupe School v. Morrissey-berruAmicus (for petitioner)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon1764%
OT 2019Holguin-hernandez v. United StatesRespondentAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralLost940%
OT 2019Comcast Corp. v. National Association of African American-owned MediaAmicus (for petitioner)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon2674%
OT 2018Emulex Corp. v. VarjabedianAmicusAssistant to the Solicitor General–1364%
OT 2018Virginia House of Delegates v. Bethune-hillAmicusAssistant to the Solicitor General–1467%

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).