Miguel Estrada
Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney · argued OT 2011–2019
5arguments since OT 2010
4–0record (side argued for), 100%
30Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
56%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2019 | Comcast Corp. v. National Association of African American-owned Media | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 33 | 43% |
| OT 2016 | Coventry Health Care of Missouri v. Nevils | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 19 | 62% |
| OT 2013 | NLRB v. Noel Canning | Amicus (for respondent) | Attorney | Won | 16 | 59% |
| OT 2012 | Comcast Corporation et al. v. Caroline Behrend et al. | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 38 | 60% |
| OT 2011 | Edward Dorsey, SR. v. United States | Amicus | Attorney | – | 41 | – |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).