Michael R. Huston

Private practice · Phoenix, Arizona · Assistant to the Solicitor General, Attorney · argued OT 2017–2025

12arguments since OT 2010
6–5record (side argued for), 55%
45Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
60%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
21719212325

Arguments

TermCaseSideRoleResultRemarks facedDoubt (Jev)
OT 2025Hikma Pharmaceuticals USA Inc. v. Amarin Pharma, Inc.RespondentAttorneyLost3840%
OT 2024Parrish v. United StatesAmicus (for respondent)AttorneyLost2968%
OT 2024Environmental Protection Agency v. Calumet Shreveport Refining, LLCRespondentAttorneyLost6069%
OT 2021Egbert v. BouleAmicus (for petitioner)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon2657%
OT 2021Hughes v. Northwestern UniversityAmicus (for petitioner)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon2550%
OT 2020Sanchez v. MayorkasRespondentAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon3250%
OT 2020Brownback v. KingPetitionerAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon2957%
OT 2019Kansas v. GloverAmicus (for petitioner)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon1682%
OT 2019Rodriguez v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.RespondentAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralLost6259%
OT 2018Dawson v. SteagerAmicus (for petitioner)Assistant to the Solicitor GeneralWon1750%
OT 2018Smith v. BerryhillAmicusAssistant to the Solicitor General–1960%
OT 2017Lagos v. United StatesRespondentAssistant to the Solicitor GeneralLost4783%

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).