Michael R. Dreeben

Office of the Solicitor General · Washington, D.C. · Deputy Solicitor General, Attorney, Department of Justice · argued OT 2010–2023

31arguments since OT 2010
14–15record (side argued for), 48%
51Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
67%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)

Arguments by term

Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
51012141618202223

Arguments

TermCaseSideRoleResultRemarks facedDoubt (Jev)
OT 2023Trump v. United StatesRespondentDepartment of JusticeLost20939%
OT 2022Ciminelli v. United StatesPetitionerAttorneyWon3246%
OT 2021United States v. TaylorRespondentAttorneyWon5457%
OT 2021City of Austin, Texas v. Reagan National Advertising of Texas IncPetitionerAttorneyWon3151%
OT 2017United States v. Microsoft Corp.PetitionerDeputy Solicitor GeneralWon4656%
OT 2017Carpenter v. United StatesRespondentDeputy Solicitor GeneralLost8587%
OT 2016Beckles v. United StatesRespondentDeputy Solicitor GeneralWon2577%
OT 2016Salman v. United States–Deputy Solicitor General–56–
OT 2016Turner v. United StatesRespondentDeputy Solicitor GeneralWon1575%
OT 2015Welch v. United StatesRespondentDeputy Solicitor GeneralLost1239%
OT 2015Mcdonnell v. United StatesRespondentDeputy Solicitor GeneralLost4871%
OT 2015Luis v. United StatesRespondentDeputy Solicitor GeneralLost5270%
OT 2015Montgomery v. LouisianaAmicus (for petitioner)Deputy Solicitor GeneralWon2452%
OT 2014Elonis v. United StatesRespondentDeputy Solicitor GeneralLost5283%
OT 2014Johnson v. United StatesRespondentDeputy Solicitor GeneralLost6675%
OT 2014City of Los Angeles, California v. PatelAmicus (for petitioner)Deputy Solicitor GeneralLost2564%
OT 2013No. 13-212PetitionerDeputy Solicitor General–33–
OT 2013Riley v. CaliforniaAmicus (for respondent)Deputy Solicitor GeneralLost1874%
OT 2013Unite Here Local 355 v. MulhallAmicus (for petitioner)Deputy Solicitor GeneralLost2052%
OT 2013Paroline v. United StatesRespondentDeputy Solicitor GeneralLost4078%
OT 2013Kaley v. United StatesRespondentDeputy Solicitor GeneralWon4576%
OT 2012United States v. Anthony James KebodeauxPetitionerDeputy Solicitor GeneralWon4476%
OT 2012Maryland v. Alonzo Jay King, JR.Amicus (for petitioner)Deputy Solicitor GeneralWon2775%
OT 2012Allen Ryan Alleyne v. United StatesRespondentDeputy Solicitor GeneralLost5580%
OT 2012Roselva Chaidez v. United StatesRespondentDeputy Solicitor GeneralWon32–
OT 2011Southern Union Co. v. United StatesRespondentDeputy Solicitor GeneralLost5480%
OT 2011Edward Dorsey, SR. v. United StatesPetitionerDeputy Solicitor GeneralWon39–
OT 2011Williams v. IllinoisAmicus (for respondent)Deputy Solicitor GeneralWon1563%
OT 2011United States v. Antoine JonesPetitionerDeputy Solicitor GeneralLost5886%
OT 2010Carol Anne Bond v. United StatesAmicus (for respondent)Deputy Solicitor GeneralLost29–
OT 2010Willie Gene Davis v. United StatesRespondentDeputy Solicitor GeneralWon3365%

Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).