Michael M. Daniel
Private practice · Dallas, Tex. · Attorney · argued OT 2014
1argument since OT 2010
1–0record (side argued for), 100%
25Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
50%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2014 | Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. Inclusive Communities Project, Inc. | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 25 | 50% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).