Michael J. Mongan
State government · California, et al. · State Solicitor General · argued OT 2019–2022
4arguments since OT 2010
2–1record (side argued for), 67%
37Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
63%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2022 | National Pork Producers Council v. Ross | Respondent | State Solicitor General | Won | 33 | 71% |
| OT 2020 | Cedar Point Nursery v. Hassid | Respondent | State Solicitor General | Lost | 51 | 78% |
| OT 2020 | California v. Texas | – | State Solicitor General | – | 36 | 55% |
| OT 2019 | Department of Homeland Security v. Regents of the University of California | Respondent | State Solicitor General | Won | 29 | 47% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).