Michael B. Kimberly
Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney · argued OT 2015–2025
10arguments since OT 2010
3–5record (side argued for), 38%
49Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
56%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2025 | Galette v. New Jersey Transit Corporation et al. | – | Attorney | – | 43 | 40% |
| OT 2024 | Hewitt v. United States | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 39 | – |
| OT 2021 | Houston Community College System v. Wilson | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 39 | 61% |
| OT 2021 | Denezpi v. United States | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 45 | 58% |
| OT 2019 | Lucky Brand Dungarees Inc. v. Marcel Fashion Group Inc. | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 69 | 66% |
| OT 2018 | No. 18-726 | Respondent | Attorney | – | 66 | – |
| OT 2018 | Smith v. Berryhill | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 17 | 50% |
| OT 2017 | Benisek v. Lamone | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 67 | 64% |
| OT 2016 | Weaver v. Massachusetts | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 50 | 67% |
| OT 2015 | Shapiro v. Mcmanus | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 51 | 40% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).