Michael A. Carvin
Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney · argued OT 2011–2020
7arguments since OT 2010
3–3record (side argued for), 50%
57Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
63%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2020 | Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 57 | 64% |
| OT 2018 | American Legion v. American Humanist Association | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 43 | 71% |
| OT 2015 | Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 81 | – |
| OT 2015 | Wittman v. Personhuballah | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 60 | 73% |
| OT 2014 | King v. Burwell | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 76 | 59% |
| OT 2013 | Susan B. Anthony List v. Driehaus | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 23 | 48% |
| OT 2011 | No. 11-398 | Respondent | Attorney | – | 56 | – |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).