Matthew W.H. Wessler
Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney · argued OT 2012–2026
6arguments since OT 2010
3–2record (side argued for), 60%
39Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
72%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2026 | Anderson v. Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee | Petitioner | Attorney | – | 65 | – |
| OT 2024 | Mclaughlin Chiropractic Associates v. Mckesson Corporation | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 43 | 74% |
| OT 2019 | Intel Corp. Investment Policy Committee v. Sulyma | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 29 | 63% |
| OT 2016 | Coventry Health Care of Missouri v. Nevils | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 35 | 83% |
| OT 2013 | Heimeshoff v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co. | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 34 | 67% |
| OT 2012 | Us Airways, Inc., in Its Capacity As Fiduciary and Plan Administrator of the Us Airways, Inc. Employee Benefits Plan v. James E. Mccutchen et al. | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 30 | 71% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).