Matthew S. Hellman
Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney · argued OT 2013–2022
4arguments since OT 2010
3–1record (side argued for), 75%
42Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
53%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2022 | Abitron Austria GMBH v. Hetronic Int'l | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 31 | 70% |
| OT 2021 | Nance v. Ward | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 42 | 39% |
| OT 2017 | Marinello v. United States | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 60 | 40% |
| OT 2013 | Law v. Siegel | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 34 | 64% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).