Mark T. Stancil
Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney · argued OT 2010–2011
2arguments since OT 2010
0–2record (side argued for), 0%
52Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
68%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2011 | Christine Armour et al. v. City of Indianapolis, Indiana et al. | Petitioner | Attorney | Lost | 55 | 70% |
| OT 2010 | Ricky D Fox v. Judy Ann Vice, As Executrix of the Estate of Vice et al. | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 49 | 66% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).