Mark D. Harris
Private practice · New York, New York · Attorney · argued OT 2013–2022
2arguments since OT 2010
1–1record (side argued for), 50%
49Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
63%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2022 | Financial Oversight and Management Bd for Puerto Rico v. Centro de Periodismo Investigativo | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 53 | 49% |
| OT 2013 | Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 45 | 76% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).