Mark Brnovich
State government · Phoenix, Arizona · State Attorney General's office, Attorney General · argued OT 2015–2021
3arguments since OT 2010
2–1record (side argued for), 67%
47Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
46%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2021 | Arizona v. City and County of San Francisco, California | Petitioner | Attorney General | Lost | 81 | 44% |
| OT 2020 | Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee | Petitioner | Attorney General | Won | 40 | 51% |
| OT 2015 | Harris v. Arizona Independent Redistricting Commission | Respondent | State Attorney General's office | Won | 20 | 43% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).