Mark A. Perry
Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney · argued OT 2010–2020
8arguments since OT 2010
4–3record (side argued for), 57%
37Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
65%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2020 | No. 19-1434 | – | Attorney | – | 14 | – |
| OT 2018 | Rimini Street Inc. v. Oracle USA Inc. | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 30 | 59% |
| OT 2017 | Lucia v. SEC | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 19 | 60% |
| OT 2013 | Alice Corp. Pty. Ltd. v. CLS Bank Int'l | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 20 | 62% |
| OT 2013 | Lawson v. FMR LLC | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 45 | 72% |
| OT 2013 | Petrella v. Metro-goldwyn-mayer, Inc. | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 43 | 73% |
| OT 2011 | Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. et al. v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al. | Respondent | Attorney | Lost | 47 | – |
| OT 2010 | Janus Capital Group, Inc. et al. v. First Derivative Traders | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 79 | 63% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).