Marc E. Elias
Private practice · Washington, D.C. · Attorney · argued OT 2015–2025
5arguments since OT 2010
4–0record (side argued for), 100%
27Justice remarks faced per argument (open period; all advocates 47)
58%of those remarks read as doubt by Jev (all advocates 63%)
Arguments by term
Side wonSide lostPending / unclear
Arguments
| Term | Case | Side | Role | Result | Remarks faced | Doubt (Jev) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OT 2025 | National Republican Senatorial Committee et al. v. Federal Election Commission et al. | – | Attorney | – | 19 | 50% |
| OT 2018 | Virginia House of Delegates v. Bethune-hill | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 17 | 50% |
| OT 2016 | Bethune-hill v. Va Bd. of Elections | Petitioner | Attorney | Won | 46 | 48% |
| OT 2016 | Cooper v. Harris | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 27 | 68% |
| OT 2015 | Wittman v. Personhuballah | Respondent | Attorney | Won | 28 | 72% |
Names, roles and sides from each transcript's list of appearances; results from the Supreme Court Database (did the side argued for win). Remarks faced: Justice turns of five words or more right after this advocate spoke, open period only. Doubt: TypeSafe's Jev reading of those remarks (an experiment, available where our research run covered the case).